IBN UTHAYMEEN TAFSEER :
Grammar & Rhetoric: How Sentence Structure Elevates Meaning
The commentary draws out incredible linguistic tools used in these verses to highlight key spiritual lessons:
A. Repetition for Honor
In Verse 5, Allah repeats the demonstrative pronoun ‘Ula’ika’ ($أُولَٰئِكَ$):
﴿أُولَٰئِكَ عَلَىٰ هُدًى مِّن رَّبِّهِمْ ۖ وَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْمُفْلِحُونَ﴾
“Those are upon guidance from their Lord, and those are the successful.”
Why repeat the word “Those”? In classical Arabic rhetoric ($بَلَاغَة$), repeating $أُولَٰئِكَ$ serves to elevate their status and emphasize that ultimate success ($الْفَلَاح$) belongs exclusively to them.
B. The Separator Pronoun ($ضَمِير\text{ }الْفَصْل$)
In the phrase ﴿وَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْمُفْلِحُونَ﴾, the word ﴿هُمُ﴾ is inserted between the subject and the predicate. Grammatically, this is a Damīr Al-Fasl. It serves three major purposes:
-
Emphasis ($التَّأْكِيد$): Reinforces the reality of their success.
-
Exclusivity ($الْحَصْر$): Limits true ultimate success to the Muttaqīn alone.
-
Clarification: Ensures the word that follows ($الْمُفْلِحُونَ$) is read as the Predicate ($خَبَر$), not a mere descriptive adjective ($صِفَة$).
The Sentence Structure in Question
The verse in Surah Al-Baqarah (2:5) reads:
-
﴿أُولَٰئِكَ﴾ (‘Ulā’ika): Demonstrative pronoun = Subject ($مُبْتَدَأ$) (“Those…”)
-
﴿هُمُ﴾ (Hum): Separator pronoun = $ضَمِير\text{ }الْفَصْل$ (“they / it is they…”)
-
﴿الْمُفْلِحُونَ﴾ (Al-Mufliḥūn): Definite noun = The Successful
Case 1: What if ﴿هُمُ﴾ WAS NOT THERE? (Omitted)
If the verse simply read ﴿وَأُولَٰئِكَ الْمُفْلِحُونَ﴾ (wā’ulā’ika al-mufliḥūn):
﴿أُولَٰئِكَ﴾ ﴿الْمُفْلِحُونَ﴾
Subject (Definite) Definite Noun
│ │
└──────────────┬───────────────┘
▼
In standard Arabic grammar:
Definite + Definite = ADJECTIVE (صفة)
The Grammatical Problem:
In Arabic grammar, when a definite noun follows a demonstrative pronoun (like ‘Ulā’ika), the default assumption is that the second word is a descriptive adjective ($صِفَة$) or an apposition ($بَدَل$), NOT the main predicate ($خَبَر$) that finishes the thought.
What it would mean:
-
The sentence becomes an incomplete clause: “Those successful people…”
-
The listener is left hanging, waiting for the predicate: “Those successful people… what about them?”
-
To make it a complete sentence without hum, the word Al-Mufliḥūn would have to drop its definite article ($ال$) and become indefinite: ﴿وَأُولَٰئِكَ مُفْلِحُونَ﴾ (“Those are successful people”). But making it indefinite weakens the statement—it would mean they are just some generic group of successful people among many.
Case 2: What happens WHEN ﴿هُمُ﴾ IS INCLUDED? (The Actual Quranic Text)
By inserting ﴿هُمُ﴾ between two definite nouns, Allah places a wall/separator ($فَصْل$) between them:
﴿أُولَٰئِكَ﴾ ﴿هُمُ﴾ ﴿الْمُفْلِحُونَ﴾
Subject Separator Pronoun PREDICATE (خبر)
(Demonstrative) (Damīr Al-Faṣl) (Forced to be the main
statement, not a description)
The Significance of Doing It (Including ﴿هُمُ﴾):
-
It Locks Al-Mufliḥūn as the Predicate (خَبَر$):
The pronoun acts as a grammatical “stop sign.” It tells the reader: “Stop treating the next word as a descriptive modifier. The next word is the core message and conclusion of the sentence.”
Translation: “And those—they are the successful.”
-
It Creates Absolute Exclusivity ($الْحَصْر\text{ }وَالاِخْتِصَاص$):
In Arabic rhetoric, placing a separator pronoun between a subject and a definite predicate limits the quality exclusively to that subject. It doesn’t just say they are successful; it implies only they are the truly successful ones. Everyone else who lacks their qualities (the 5 traits of Taqwa mentioned in verses 3–4) is excluded from real, ultimate success.
-
It Keeps the Definite Article ($ال$):
By keeping the (Al-) on Al-Mufliḥūn, it refers to The Ultimate, Complete Success (success in this life and the Hereafter), rather than just a partial or temporal success.